Asked by Dee365
While a corporation may be characterized as a "person" capable of a crime, basing fault on the same psychological processes as apply to people raises problematic issues with respect to moral turpitude, the mens rea element of offences and defences.
A realistic approach to making corporations accountable requires an exploration of the decision-making structure of companies and a degree of innovation in adapting the elements that define individual, human culpability. All the traditional common law theories, as well as newer statutory models, entail a definition of the links between the criminal act and the decisions of management as it represents the corporate entity.
A realistic approach to making corporations accountable requires an exploration of the decision-making structure of companies and a degree of innovation in adapting the elements that define individual, human culpability. All the traditional common law theories, as well as newer statutory models, entail a definition of the links between the criminal act and the decisions of management as it represents the corporate entity.
Answers
Answered by
tshimololo
Can I do criminology law with mathslit
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.