Asked by Khaiguy0900
Al Smith was accused of stealing a television set and arrested. The police told Al that witnesses saw him take the television set. During his court trial,
the witnesses are not revealed to the defendant. What should happen, according to the principle of due process and the U.S. Constitution?
The case will be dismissed because Al has a right to be confronted by the witnesses against him.
The case will be dismissed because Al has a right to a speedy and public trial.
The case will be continued because Al will have a lawyer appointed to represent him.
The case will be continued because Al has a right to be informed of the accusation against him.
the witnesses are not revealed to the defendant. What should happen, according to the principle of due process and the U.S. Constitution?
The case will be dismissed because Al has a right to be confronted by the witnesses against him.
The case will be dismissed because Al has a right to a speedy and public trial.
The case will be continued because Al will have a lawyer appointed to represent him.
The case will be continued because Al has a right to be informed of the accusation against him.
Answers
Answered by
Writeacher
And you think ... ?
Answered by
Damon
Read Bill of RIGHTS
Answered by
bobpursley
In high school, one hears "...she said that I said that he said that momma said ..."
That is not evidence.
That is not evidence.
Answered by
Eunique
The case will be dismissed because Al has a right to be confronted by the witnesses against him.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.