A big city newspaper prints a story containing untrue statements about the city's mayor that describe him as having stolen a lage amount of money from the public. The story is completely untrue and was invented by the writer of the story.

Question

--Why is it necessary to limit constitutional rights in scenarios such as this one?
A)to protect government from critical speech
B)to protect citizens from the abuses of a free press
C)to protect media from attacks by people mentioned
D)to protect politicians from the threats of censorship
THANK YOU!

Answer 1

And you think it's ... ?

Answer 2

we are thinking "B". Are we right? Thank you!

Answer 3

I agree with you.