Asked by XenaGonzalez
Which was an argument against ratification of the Constitution? (1 point)
A Bill of Rights is not necessary.
The Ohio Plan should be used.
A strong national government will become oppressive.
A strong national government is necessary for national security.
A
A Bill of Rights is not necessary.
The Ohio Plan should be used.
A strong national government will become oppressive.
A strong national government is necessary for national security.
A
Answers
Answered by
Writeacher
In the US?
In a state? If so, which one?
In a state? If so, which one?
Answered by
XenaGonzalez
in the us yes
Answered by
Writeacher
Read the sections on The Federalists, The Anti-Federalists, and Reaction in the States here:
https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us-articles-of-confederation/the-great-debate/
This is also very good:
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/teachers/lesson_plans/pdfs/unit2_13.pdf
Remember that when the Constitution was first sent out for ratification, the Bill of Rights had not been written yet.
https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us-articles-of-confederation/the-great-debate/
This is also very good:
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/teachers/lesson_plans/pdfs/unit2_13.pdf
Remember that when the Constitution was first sent out for ratification, the Bill of Rights had not been written yet.
Answered by
XenaGonzalez
so its C ?
Answered by
Writeacher
I agree.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.