Asked by XenaGonzalez
                Which was an argument against ratification of the Constitution?   (1 point)
A Bill of Rights is not necessary.
The Ohio Plan should be used.
A strong national government will become oppressive.
A strong national government is necessary for national security.
A
            
        A Bill of Rights is not necessary.
The Ohio Plan should be used.
A strong national government will become oppressive.
A strong national government is necessary for national security.
A
Answers
                    Answered by
            Writeacher
            
    In the US?
In a state? If so, which one?
    
In a state? If so, which one?
                    Answered by
            XenaGonzalez
            
    in the us yes
    
                    Answered by
            Writeacher
            
    Read the sections on The Federalists, The Anti-Federalists, and Reaction in the States here:
https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us-articles-of-confederation/the-great-debate/
This is also very good:
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/teachers/lesson_plans/pdfs/unit2_13.pdf
Remember that when the Constitution was first sent out for ratification, the Bill of Rights had not been written yet.
    
https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us-articles-of-confederation/the-great-debate/
This is also very good:
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/teachers/lesson_plans/pdfs/unit2_13.pdf
Remember that when the Constitution was first sent out for ratification, the Bill of Rights had not been written yet.
                    Answered by
            XenaGonzalez
            
    so its C ?
    
                    Answered by
            Writeacher
            
    I agree.
    
                                                    There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
                                            
                Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.