Asked by XenaGonzalez
Which was an argument against ratification of the Constitution? (1 point)
A Bill of Rights is not necessary.
The Ohio Plan should be used.
A strong national government will become oppressive.
A strong national government is necessary for national security.
A
A Bill of Rights is not necessary.
The Ohio Plan should be used.
A strong national government will become oppressive.
A strong national government is necessary for national security.
A
Answers
Answered by
Writeacher
In the US?
In a state? If so, which one?
In a state? If so, which one?
Answered by
XenaGonzalez
in the us yes
Answered by
Writeacher
Read the sections on The Federalists, The Anti-Federalists, and Reaction in the States here:
https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us-articles-of-confederation/the-great-debate/
This is also very good:
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/teachers/lesson_plans/pdfs/unit2_13.pdf
Remember that when the Constitution was first sent out for ratification, the Bill of Rights had not been written yet.
https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us-articles-of-confederation/the-great-debate/
This is also very good:
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/teachers/lesson_plans/pdfs/unit2_13.pdf
Remember that when the Constitution was first sent out for ratification, the Bill of Rights had not been written yet.
Answered by
XenaGonzalez
so its C ?
Answered by
Writeacher
I agree.