Asked by I NEED HELP
                prove that a negative number divided by a positive number is negative
            
            
        Answers
                    Answered by
            David Q
            
    Proof by contradiction:
Suppose not. Then a negative number N divided by a positive number P would be positive or zero. (I've assumed incidentally that all numbers are positive, negative or zero, and that zero is neither positive nor negative.)
Assume N/P is positive. Call that positive number Q, so N/P=Q. Multiply both sides by P. Then P*(N/P) = P*Q. But P*(N/P)=N, so N=P*Q. A positive number times a positive number is positive, so you now have a negative number (N) equals a positive number (P*Q). That's not possible. Contradiction.
Now suppose N/P = 0 (the other possibility we originally identified). Multiply both sides by P. Then N=0*P=0, which isn't a negative number. Contradiction.
So the original supposition must have been wrong.
(I don't like this "proof" however, since I've assumed among other things that a positive number times a positive number is positive - which though intuitively obvious is possibly as contentious as the original proposition. Does anyone have a better idea?)
    
Suppose not. Then a negative number N divided by a positive number P would be positive or zero. (I've assumed incidentally that all numbers are positive, negative or zero, and that zero is neither positive nor negative.)
Assume N/P is positive. Call that positive number Q, so N/P=Q. Multiply both sides by P. Then P*(N/P) = P*Q. But P*(N/P)=N, so N=P*Q. A positive number times a positive number is positive, so you now have a negative number (N) equals a positive number (P*Q). That's not possible. Contradiction.
Now suppose N/P = 0 (the other possibility we originally identified). Multiply both sides by P. Then N=0*P=0, which isn't a negative number. Contradiction.
So the original supposition must have been wrong.
(I don't like this "proof" however, since I've assumed among other things that a positive number times a positive number is positive - which though intuitively obvious is possibly as contentious as the original proposition. Does anyone have a better idea?)
                                                    There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
                                            
                Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.