Asked by Amber
                I need help with these problems, I cannot find a similar example to help me in the book:
1. Find lim x->infinity (e^(-2x) + sin x).
2. Find the derivative of sqrt(9-x) using the limit process.
3. Find lim x-> -infinity (x + sqrt(x^2 + 2x)).
4. Show that the equation e^x = 2+2x has a solution that is a negative number.
            
            
        1. Find lim x->infinity (e^(-2x) + sin x).
2. Find the derivative of sqrt(9-x) using the limit process.
3. Find lim x-> -infinity (x + sqrt(x^2 + 2x)).
4. Show that the equation e^x = 2+2x has a solution that is a negative number.
Answers
                    Answered by
            Reiny
            
    1. done by just getting a "feel" for the numbers
e^(-2x) = 1/e^(2x)
so as x ---> infinitity, the denominator gets huge and the result approaches zero
as for the sinx it simply runs up and down between -1 and 1 no matter what x is or how large x is
So the lim(e^(-2x) + sinx) does not reach an actual value, but simply fluctuages between -1 and 1
e.g. x = 500000
value = e^(-1000000) + sin(50000)
= "almost" zero + .1778..
for x = 500002
I get "zero" + sin500002 = -.9688..
2.
dy/dx = lim( √(9-x) - √(9-x-h) )/h , as h --->0
= lim( √(9-x) - √(9-x-h) )/h * ( √(9-x) + √(9-x-h) )/( √(9-x) + √(9-x-h) )
= lim ( 9-x - (9-x-h)/(h(√(9-x) + √(9-x-h) )
= lim h/(h(√(9-x) + √(9-x-h) )
= lim 1/(√(9-x) + √(9-x-h) ) , as h ---> 0
= 1/(√(9-x) + √(9-x))
= 1/(2√(9-x) )
the x--->0 should be included in each line except the last two, I was just being lazy
3. since there is no denominator, nor are we taking √ of a negative, there should be no problem here,
Again, just get a feel for the numbers
look at the √(x^2 + 2x)
as gets larger into the negatives, x^2 makes it positive
and x^2 gets bigger much faster than 2x
so the x^2 eventually leaves the 2x behind and taking √ brings us back to x
so we have lim (-x + x) or lim 0, which is 0
4. e^x = 2+2x
let y1= e^x and let y2 = 2x+2, the latter is a straight line
let's graph both of these.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+y+%3D+e%5Ex+%2C+y%3D2x%2B2
As you can see, there are actually two solutions, one x is positive, the other is negative.
Let's actually solve the equation
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+e%5Ex%3D2x%2B2
notice that x = -.768039 and x = +1.67835
testing:
LS = e^1.67835 = 5.35671
RS = 2(1.67835) + 2 = 5.3567 , close enough
    
e^(-2x) = 1/e^(2x)
so as x ---> infinitity, the denominator gets huge and the result approaches zero
as for the sinx it simply runs up and down between -1 and 1 no matter what x is or how large x is
So the lim(e^(-2x) + sinx) does not reach an actual value, but simply fluctuages between -1 and 1
e.g. x = 500000
value = e^(-1000000) + sin(50000)
= "almost" zero + .1778..
for x = 500002
I get "zero" + sin500002 = -.9688..
2.
dy/dx = lim( √(9-x) - √(9-x-h) )/h , as h --->0
= lim( √(9-x) - √(9-x-h) )/h * ( √(9-x) + √(9-x-h) )/( √(9-x) + √(9-x-h) )
= lim ( 9-x - (9-x-h)/(h(√(9-x) + √(9-x-h) )
= lim h/(h(√(9-x) + √(9-x-h) )
= lim 1/(√(9-x) + √(9-x-h) ) , as h ---> 0
= 1/(√(9-x) + √(9-x))
= 1/(2√(9-x) )
the x--->0 should be included in each line except the last two, I was just being lazy
3. since there is no denominator, nor are we taking √ of a negative, there should be no problem here,
Again, just get a feel for the numbers
look at the √(x^2 + 2x)
as gets larger into the negatives, x^2 makes it positive
and x^2 gets bigger much faster than 2x
so the x^2 eventually leaves the 2x behind and taking √ brings us back to x
so we have lim (-x + x) or lim 0, which is 0
4. e^x = 2+2x
let y1= e^x and let y2 = 2x+2, the latter is a straight line
let's graph both of these.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+y+%3D+e%5Ex+%2C+y%3D2x%2B2
As you can see, there are actually two solutions, one x is positive, the other is negative.
Let's actually solve the equation
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=solve+e%5Ex%3D2x%2B2
notice that x = -.768039 and x = +1.67835
testing:
LS = e^1.67835 = 5.35671
RS = 2(1.67835) + 2 = 5.3567 , close enough
                                                    There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
                                            
                Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.