Asked by Robert

The federalists argued that a Bill of Rights was not necessary because?

A. All basic protections were contained in the Constitution.
B. the anti-Federalists were being irrational.
C. it impedes the authority of the government.
D. it would take too long to ratify.
Answered by Ms. Sue
http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/
Answered by Robert
After reading this link, would it be All basic protections were contained in the Constitution?
Answered by Ms. Sue
Right.
Answered by Robert
Thank you Ms. Sue
Answered by Ms. Sue
You are welcome, Robert.
Answered by Robert
Actually the correct answer is "C" it impedes the authority of the government.
Answered by Ms. Sue
I've found that I disagree with many online schools' answers.

What does your book say about this question?