Asked by rfvv
                1. He was ashamed of having no money.
2. He was ashamed to have no money.
3..He was ashamed because he had no money.
(Are they all the same and grammatical? Can we substitute 'shy' for 'ashamed'?)
            
        2. He was ashamed to have no money.
3..He was ashamed because he had no money.
(Are they all the same and grammatical? Can we substitute 'shy' for 'ashamed'?)
Answers
                    Answered by
            Writeacher
            
    All are correct and mean the same thing. 
But, no, 'shy' is not the same thing as 'ashamed.'
    
But, no, 'shy' is not the same thing as 'ashamed.'
                                                    There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
                                            
                Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.