Asked by can you check my answers
Miranda has a theory that some people are able to “see the future.” She has tested this theory and found that she is unable to produce an individual with above chance predictions. She revises her theory to explain that when asked about the future, these people are unable to report what they know, but she is still confident that her theory is correct. Why is this theory unacceptable in science? (Points : 1)
It lacks specificity
It is not falsifiable
It is not parsimonious
It is based on empiricism
my answer is it lacks specificity
It lacks specificity
It is not falsifiable
It is not parsimonious
It is based on empiricism
my answer is it lacks specificity
Answers
Answered by
Writeacher
I think it's the fourth choice.
http://www.dictionary.com Look up "empiricism."
http://www.dictionary.com Look up "empiricism."
Answered by
PsyDAG
I would tend to go with "not falsifiable." This theory is NOT "based on empiricism," since "she is unable to produce an individual with above chance predictions."
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.