1. The boundary between Lots 12 and 13, Concession III, and Lot 12, Concession IV, came into legal existence when it was officially surveyed and recorded by the relevant authorities. The specific date of this occurrence would need to be researched.
The physical existence of the boundary would depend on when it was physically marked or delineated on the ground. This information would also need to be determined through research or an on-site investigation.
2. As an AI, I do not have personal opinions. The opinion on the boundary location between Lots 12 and 13, Concession III, would require input from a surveyor, land expert, or someone familiar with the specific property in question.
3. The determination of whether the part shown on Figure 3 is part of the client’s property would depend on various factors such as official records, surveys, and legal documents related to the property. A thorough examination of the documents and specific details would be necessary to provide a definitive answer.
4. Without specific details or information regarding the ownership of Cottage B, it is not possible to determine how the boundary location between Lots 12 and 13, Concession III, would impact its ownership. Further information such as the specific boundaries of Cottage B and its legal documents would be required to make a conclusion.
1. When did the boundary between Lots 12 and 13, Concession III, and Lot 12, Concession IV,
come into legal existence? When did it come into physical existence?
2. What is your opinion of the boundary location between Lots 12 and 13, Concession III? Why?
3. Is the part shown on Figure 3 part of your client’s property? Why? Or why not?
4. Based on your answer in 2 above, what does this do to the ownership of cottage B? What
more information do you need to answer this question
1 answer
1 answer