1. Patrick Henry falsely assumed that the government was founded with the intention to oppress the American people and restrict their freedoms. He believed that the government was inevitably prone to becoming too powerful and tyrannical.
2. To counteract Henry’s objections, one could argue that the founding of the government was actually based on the principles of liberty, democracy, and protecting individual rights. The Constitution, for example, was created to establish a system of checks and balances, preventing any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. Additionally, the Bill of Rights was added to protect citizens' fundamental freedoms and limit the government's authority. It can be highlighted that the government's purpose is to serve the people and uphold their rights rather than oppress them.
3. Whether one agrees or disagrees with Patrick Henry's opinion may depend on their perspective and contextual understanding. One may agree with Henry's concern about the potential abuse of power by government, as history has shown numerous instances of authoritarian regimes. However, one might also disagree with Henry's blanket assumption that the government was inherently founded to oppress the people. It is important to consider the intentions and principles behind the founding of the government, as well as the measures in place to prevent tyranny. Ultimately, the question of agreement or disagreement would require an analysis of historical context and personal beliefs about the role and nature of government.
1. Upon what false assumption did Patrick Henry state that the government was founded?
2. How would you counteract Henry’s objections?
3. Explain why you agree or disagree with Patrick Henry’s opinion
2 answers
Cheating used to be considered an unmentionable sin. However, in this day and age, it has become more common and somewhat of a daily occurrence. Cheating is more widespread today than in the past. According to the article titled Education: The New Morality, cheating has not been an issue of values, but simply one of practicality. This shows that many view cheating as a mere occurrence and something that can often be skipped over. The reason cheating has become such a pervasive movement is because many students tend to rationalize their cheating behavior. A common rationalization that many students use is, “ That’s the only way I’ll get anywhere in life.” Many students also tend to incorporate reasons, such as parental…show more content…
They can leave their valuables and belongings out and not worry as much about theft and dishonesty. By reinforcing academic integrity, many students tend to weave personal integrity into their daily actions. The other attempt was the way of punishment. Many professors have offered all sorts of punishments ranging from receiving a zero on an assignment/test to possible expulsion. The benefit of this type of settlement is the possibility for reform. The last attempt I mentioned was a possible integration of computers into the everyday classroom. By including this, students are graded based on their work in front of a computer (monitored, of course) leaving less room for cheating to occur.
There are many great ideas and ways to curb cheating, however, many times, they work best together. Both ideas, issuing an honor code and possible punishments, are both successful ways to limit the amount of cheating. However, they also work best side by side. For example, by issuing an honor code involves student participation. It turns from “administration vs. students” to “students helping each other”. With this sort of involvement, there is a greater likelihood that cheating can be curbed. On the other hand, those who were adamant about cheating in the first place may stick to their dishonest ways. In this case, after the honor code has been issued, consequences for offenses should be issued so that offenders are aware of the
They can leave their valuables and belongings out and not worry as much about theft and dishonesty. By reinforcing academic integrity, many students tend to weave personal integrity into their daily actions. The other attempt was the way of punishment. Many professors have offered all sorts of punishments ranging from receiving a zero on an assignment/test to possible expulsion. The benefit of this type of settlement is the possibility for reform. The last attempt I mentioned was a possible integration of computers into the everyday classroom. By including this, students are graded based on their work in front of a computer (monitored, of course) leaving less room for cheating to occur.
There are many great ideas and ways to curb cheating, however, many times, they work best together. Both ideas, issuing an honor code and possible punishments, are both successful ways to limit the amount of cheating. However, they also work best side by side. For example, by issuing an honor code involves student participation. It turns from “administration vs. students” to “students helping each other”. With this sort of involvement, there is a greater likelihood that cheating can be curbed. On the other hand, those who were adamant about cheating in the first place may stick to their dishonest ways. In this case, after the honor code has been issued, consequences for offenses should be issued so that offenders are aware of the