Answer 4[D]: The Framers wanted the Senate to be able to check executive power.
The Senate was given the power of advice and consent as a means to check the power of the executive branch. The Framers were concerned about the possibility of a tyrannical executive and aimed to establish a system of checks and balances. By requiring the Senate's approval for presidential nominations, such as for cabinet members, judges, and ambassadors, it ensured that no single individual or branch could have absolute control.
This power allows the Senate to thoroughly review and assess the qualifications, experience, and character of the nominees before they are appointed to important positions within the government. It serves as a mechanism to prevent the appointment of unfit or unethical individuals to key roles. Additionally, the requirement for Senate confirmation fosters transparency and accountability in the executive branch's decision-making process.
Thus, giving the Senate the power of advice and consent aligns with the Framers' intention to distribute power and prevent the concentration of authority in the executive branch, promoting a system of checks and balances in the U.S. government.
[1 Point] (Question 3): Why was the Senate given the power of advice and consent? Please explain your answer.
(Answer 1[A]: The Framers wanted the Senate to have complete control over executive departments).
(Answer 2[B]: The Framers wanted the Senate to work closely with executive departments).
(Answer 3[C]: The Framers wanted the Senate to be able to run criminal background checks on nominees).
(Answer 4[D]: The Framers wanted the Senate to be able to check executive power).
1 answer