Aiming for precision when stating an opinion or making an argument is essential, as it enhances clarity and credibility, making it easier for others to understand and engage with the viewpoint being expressed. Accuracy and precision can indeed be viewed as virtues, especially in contexts like eyewitness testimony or scientific discourse, where misinterpretations can lead to serious consequences, such as the propagation of misinformation about vaccines. In the case of the flawed study linking vaccines to autism, a lack of precision can perpetuate harmful myths that undermine public health. Therefore, striving for accurate and precise communication should be upheld as a virtue, as it fosters informed discussions and helps prevent the spread of erroneous beliefs that can have detrimental societal impacts.
1 Is it useful to aim for precision when stating an opinion or making an argument?
How so?
2. Could being accurate/precise be seen as a virtue? (Consider eyewitness testimony, A science article claims that vaccines cause autism because the author misunderstood a flawed study from years ago but fails to research current scientific consensus.
. Should it be? Explain
Make one short paragraph on the entire topic above
1 answer
1 answer