1. Choose a fairy tale or other children's story on which to base the elements of your case. Which would serve to furnish an outline for a criminal case or civil suit. i picked Goldilocks and the Three Bears

Question

2. Who are the major characters?
my answer Goldilocks and the Three Bears

3. What was the incident that will go to trial?
my answer The incident that will go to trial is Goldilocks trespassing into the bears' house, eating their food, sitting on their chairs, and sleeping in their beds without permission, causing damage to their property

4. Type of case - Civil or Criminal? Explain which and why
my answer The type of case in this scenario would be a civil case because Goldilocks did not commit a criminal offense such as theft or assault, but rather trespassed and caused damage to the bears' property without permission. This would fall under the category of civil law, which deals with disputes between individuals or organizations.

5. Evidence that the defense attorney will introduce, including witnesses:
my answer Defense attorney will introduce witnesses to testify about Goldilocks' character and intentions. They will argue that she was merely a little girl who stumbled upon an empty house and did not mean to cause any harm. Additionally, the defense will try to prove that the bears did not properly secure their property and were negligent in leaving their house and belongings unattended.

6. Jury's verdict: Tell how the jury finds in the civil or criminal case and justify the verdict. How was the burden of proof met or not met?

Answer 1

my answer: The jury finds in favor of the Three Bears in the civil case. The burden of proof was met as evidence was presented that showed Goldilocks did in fact trespass onto the bears' property, eat their food, sit on their chairs, and sleep in their beds without permission, causing damage to their property. The bears were able to prove that they suffered damages as a result of Goldilocks' actions, including reparations for property damage and emotional distress. The defense's argument about Goldilocks' lack of intent was not enough to negate her wrongdoing and the bears' claim for compensation.