Emma has $26 for her weekend expenses. She spent $12.81, including tax, on a new book. Additionally, she needs to set aside $10.00 for a lunch outing next week. If stickers cost $0.42 per package, tax included, describe the maximum number of packages (p) Emma can buy.

Which inequality should be used to solve this problem?

(1 point)
Responses

0.42p + 2.81 ≥ 26
0.42p + 2.81 ≥ 26

0.42p + 2.81 ≤ 26
0.42p + 2.81 ≤ 26

0.42p + 22.81≤ 26
0.42p + 22.81≤ 26

0.42p + 22.81≥ 26
0.42p + 22.81≥ 26
Question 2
(1 point)
The maximum number of packages Emma can buy is
.

2 answers

To determine how much money Emma has left after her book purchase and the amount she needs to set aside for lunch, we can set up the situation as follows:

  1. Total money Emma has: $26.00
  2. Amount spent on a book: $12.81
  3. Amount set aside for lunch: $10.00

First, we calculate how much money Emma has left after buying the book:

\[ \text{Remaining money} = 26.00 - 12.81 = 13.19 \]

Next, we subtract the amount she needs to set aside for lunch:

\[ \text{Money available for stickers} = 13.19 - 10.00 = 3.19 \]

Now we need to describe the maximum number of packages of stickers \( p \) that she can buy, where each package costs $0.42.

The amount she can spend on stickers is given by the inequality:

\[ 0.42p \leq 3.19 \]

To solve for \( p \), we can rewrite it as:

\[ p \leq \frac{3.19}{0.42} \]

Calculating that gives us:

\[ p \leq 7.5952 \]

Since \( p \) must be a whole number, the maximum number of packages Emma can buy is \( 7 \).

Answers:

Question 1: The correct inequality to solve this problem is:

0.42p ≤ 3.19 (not listed, but that's the context for the relevant setup)

Question 2: The maximum number of packages Emma can buy is 7.

a b c or d