When a court evaluates circumstantial evidence at the end of a trial, it must ensure to engage in logical inferential reasoning to accurately conclude which facts have been proved. In south African law of evidence

In what court case has the rules for logical inferential reasoning been drafted?

A.
Stellenbosch Farmers' Winery Group Ltd and Another v Martell Et Cie and Others 2003 (1) SA 11 (SCA) at [5].

B.
R v De Villiers 1944 AD 493 at 508-509.

C.
R v Blom 1939 AD 188 at 202-203.

D.
Director of Public Prosecutions v Kilbourne 1973 (1) All ER 440 at 456.

1 answer

A.
Stellenbosch Farmers' Winery Group Ltd and Another v Martell Et Cie and Others 2003 (1) SA 11 (SCA) at [5].
Similar Questions
  1. CASE STUDY HYPOTHESES:Circumstantial evidence is adequate or inadequate demonstrate racial profiling. Questions: Anecdotal
    1. answers icon 0 answers
  2. CASE STUDY HYPOTHESES:Circumstantial evidence is adequate or inadequate demonstrate racial profiling. Questions: Anecdotal
    1. answers icon 2 answers
  3. Crime scene investigation and steps to solve the crime utilize _____.Responses the scientific method and logic the scientific
    1. answers icon 11 answers
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions